Assessment of musculoskeletal symptoms in academics in full‑time and part-time courses
Antonelli, Gabriela; Gomes, Jossinelma Camargo; Oliveira, Marcio Antonio Klingelfus de; Baroni, Marina Pegoraro
Introduction: Musculoskeletal symptoms are affections, with or without degeneration of the tissues, and may present in various forms and be associated with multiple symptoms. At the moment its etiology is multifactorial and the pathological picture shows social relevance due to its scope and magnitude. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in academics of full-time and part-time (nighttime) courses at UNICENTRO. Methods: The study counted on 120 students of both courses and for the selection of the individuals was used the stratified sampling method. The Nordic questionnaire for musculoskeletal symptoms (NMQ) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaire were used as a form of pain identification. Results: Observing the results obtained from the NMQ, it was observed a high prevalence of symptoms in the analyzed students, being 49% in Biological Sciences and 44.8% in Physiotherapy, highlighting the region of the vertebral column, being lumbar (9.42%) in academics of Physiotherapy and thoracic region (9.14%) in academics of Biological Sciences, also noted high involvement in multiple regions (53.9%). Furthermore, it was observed the presence of mild pain trough VAS (3.78 ± 2.38). Conclusion: It was concluded that the most affected region was the spine, specifically the lumbar and thoracic. Thus, it is assumed that biomechanical overload is responsible for this finding. Thus, preventive and ergonomic measures and health promotion should be stimulated among young students, but for this purpose further studies are needed.
1. Kumar SP, Saha S. Mechanism-based classification of pain for physical therapy management in palliative care: A Clinical Commentary. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011;17(1):80-6.
2. Souza FF, Pereira LV, Cardoso R, Hortense P. Escala multidimensional de avaliação de dor (EMADOR). Rev. Latino- Am. Enfermagem. 2010;18(1).
3. Azevedo LF, Costa-Pereira A, Mendonça L, Dias CC, Castro-Lopes JM. Chronic pain and health services utilization: Is there overuse of diagnostic tests and inequalities in nonpharmacologic treatment methods utilization? Med Care. 2013;51:859-69.
4. Ando S, Yamasaki S, Shimodera S, Sasaki T, Oshima N, Furukawa TA. et al. A greater number of somatic pain sites is associated with poor mental health in adolescents: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13(30).
5. Latina R, Sansoni J, D’Angelo D, Di Biagio E, de Marinis MG, Tarsitani G. Etiology and prevalence of chronic pain in adults: A narrative review. Prof Inferm. 2013;66:151-8.
6. Lourinho, MG. et al. Riscos de lesão musculoesquelética em diferentes setores de uma empresa calçadista. Rev. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa. 2011;18(3):252-7.
7. Alencar JF, Coury H, HJCG, Oishi J. Aspectos relevantes no diagnóstico de DORT e fibromialgia. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2009;13(1):52-8.
8. Carugno M, Pesatori AC, Ferrario MM, Ferrari AL, Silva FJ, Martins AC. et al. Physical and psychosocial risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in Brazilian and Italian nurses. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2012;28(9):1632-42.
9. Moraes G. Legislação de Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho. GVC. 2013;10.
10. Magalhães OSVM, Monteiro RS, Rodrigues CCW. Análise da aplicabilidade da fisioterapia preventiva, através dos princípios e exigências ergonômicas, à odontologia: revisão da literatura. Rev. Científica ESAMAZ. 2011;3(1).
11. Marques NR, Hallal CZ, Gonçalves M. Características biomecânicas, ergonômicas e clínicas da postura sentada: uma revisão. Revista Fisioterapia e Movimento. 2010;17(3):270-6.
12. Sociedade brasileira para o estudo da dor – SBED. Impactos da dor. 2005.
13. Paixão MS, Tassitano RM, Siqueira GR. Prevalência de desconforto osteomuscular e fatores associados em estudantes universitários. Rev. Bras. Promoç. Saúde. 2013;26(2):242-50
14. Gasparini SM, Barreto SM, Assunção AA. O professor, as condições de trabalho e os efeitos sobre sua saúde. Educação e Pesquisa. 2005;31(2):189-99.
15. Falavigna A, Teles AR, Mazzocchin T, de Braga GL, Kleber FD, Barreto F, et al. Increased prevalence of low back pain among physiotherapy students compared to medical students. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:500–5.
16. Kumar G, Chhabra A, Dewan V, Yadav TP. Prevalência e impacto nas atividades diárias da dor musculoesquelética idiopática em crianças da Índia. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2015;pii: S0482-5004(15)00073-X.
17. Oksanen AM, Laimi K, Löyttyniemi E, Kunttu K. Trends of weekly musculoskeletal pain from 2000 to 2012:National study of Finnish university students. Eur J Pain. 2014;18:1316–22.
18. Zhang Y, Deng G, Zhang Z, Zhou Q, Gao X, Di L, Et al. A cross sectional study between the prevalence of chronic pain and academic pressure in adolescents in China (Shanghai). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorder. 2015;16:219-27.
19. Hanvold TN, Wærsted M, Mengshoel AM, Bjertness E, Twisk J, Veiersted KB. A longitudinal study on risk factors for neck and shoulder pain among young adults in the transition from technical school to working life. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014;40(6).
20. da Silva CD, Ferraz GC, Souza LAF, Cruz LVS, Stival MM, Pereira LV. Prevalência de dor crônica em estudantes universitários de Enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm, Florianópolis, 2011;20(3):519-25.
21. Ayanniyi O, Mbada CE, Muolokwu CA. Prevalence and Profile of Back Pain in Nigerian Adolescents. Med Princ Pract. 2011;20:368–73.